The world’s biggest farmer is in hot water with the US Food and Drug Administration for using pesticides on his crop.

Farmers use pesticides on everything from crops to meat to the land.

But the EPA says that if it was a plant that was already in the environment, it wouldn’t be allowed to be sprayed on the crop.

It also says that it is too expensive to spray on the land and that it can cause damage to the environment.

The agency says it is reviewing its practices and will update its rules in 2018. 

Farmers have also come out against the EPA, arguing that the pesticides are safe, and that they are needed to control weeds and other pests. 

The agency has been cracking down on farmers for decades.

In January, the agency said it had been in the process of revising its rules since 2013, after a spate of reports of pesticides being used on crops.

The rules allow for the spraying of pesticides to occur in a controlled setting, such as a barn or a greenhouse, when there are no other nearby crops or livestock. 

However, the rules have always had loopholes.

In the latest example, the EPA allowed a farmer to spray the crops on his farm because the agency had no evidence that the pesticide was dangerous to the crops.

In its response to the new rules, the USDA said the agency was updating its pesticide regulations to include the new guidelines.

It said it has been conducting a review of its policies, including its oversight of pesticide use and the safety of pesticides. 

What do you think of the US government’s response to pesticides?

Leave your thoughts in the comments below.